Free Essays on Effects Of Second Hand Smoke

Anti-smokers have long tried to restrict smoking on the grounds that it was bad for smokers' health. But this sort of paternalism, while it has many merits, is not very effective when it comes to getting laws passed. At least not in this country. In recent years, however, they have made great progress using the theory that smoking is bad for the health of others: that Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) can, in fact, be deadly. The phrase "respiratory illnesses", when used in connection with ETS, is usually found appended to a list of other claims, as in "cancer, heart disease and ..." It seems to round off the list nicely and is purposely left vague. If pressed, anti-smokers will, as if by rote, recite "... such as asthma, colds, influenza and pneumonia". But none of these ailments is caused by smoking, much less by ETS. Pressed further, the antis will backpedal to the claim that ETS "aggravates" these conditions. Since 1979, the number of smokers has declined significantly, from about 33% of adults, or higher, to a proportion varyingly reported as being from 20% to 25%. During the same period, a host of anti-smoking laws have dramatically curtailed smoking in public places. Today, exposure to ETS is not one tenth of what it was in 1979. So where are the mystery deaths caused by "respiratory illnesses" that can be blamed on ETS? There aren't any. The diabolical innuendo of the phrase"... cancer, heart disease and respiratory illnesses" causes many to believe people die this way and to repeat the rumor. But it is akin to saying† nuclear bombs, biological warfare and firecrackers (Tang 613)." With the pending challenge to the EPA's report, that is about to change. For a preview of the truth likely to emerge, we have only to look at a recent Australian court case in which the Australian Department of Occupational Health, Safety and Welfare was pressing a complaint against a casino in an attempt to enforce a no-smoking law. The questio... Free Essays on Effects Of Second Hand Smoke Free Essays on Effects Of Second Hand Smoke Anti-smokers have long tried to restrict smoking on the grounds that it was bad for smokers' health. But this sort of paternalism, while it has many merits, is not very effective when it comes to getting laws passed. At least not in this country. In recent years, however, they have made great progress using the theory that smoking is bad for the health of others: that Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) can, in fact, be deadly. The phrase "respiratory illnesses", when used in connection with ETS, is usually found appended to a list of other claims, as in "cancer, heart disease and ..." It seems to round off the list nicely and is purposely left vague. If pressed, anti-smokers will, as if by rote, recite "... such as asthma, colds, influenza and pneumonia". But none of these ailments is caused by smoking, much less by ETS. Pressed further, the antis will backpedal to the claim that ETS "aggravates" these conditions. Since 1979, the number of smokers has declined significantly, from about 33% of adults, or higher, to a proportion varyingly reported as being from 20% to 25%. During the same period, a host of anti-smoking laws have dramatically curtailed smoking in public places. Today, exposure to ETS is not one tenth of what it was in 1979. So where are the mystery deaths caused by "respiratory illnesses" that can be blamed on ETS? There aren't any. The diabolical innuendo of the phrase"... cancer, heart disease and respiratory illnesses" causes many to believe people die this way and to repeat the rumor. But it is akin to saying† nuclear bombs, biological warfare and firecrackers (Tang 613)." With the pending challenge to the EPA's report, that is about to change. For a preview of the truth likely to emerge, we have only to look at a recent Australian court case in which the Australian Department of Occupational Health, Safety and Welfare was pressing a complaint against a casino in an attempt to enforce a no-smoking law. The questio... Free Essays on Effects Of Second Hand Smoke Second-Hand Smoke Effects Issues on smoking have arisen in the media once again, so much so that now the government is debating whether or not this drug should be banned in public places. Exposure to second-hand smoke is the third leading cause of preventable death in the United States only behind alcohol and active smoking. There is a need to aggressively combat this health hazard. The attitudes of smokers who recognize this problem view the problem as a nuisance and continue to put others at risk. With the annoyance of the smell and smoke of cigarettes, it is obvious that advancement in banning smoking in public places must be professed. Everyone doubts that â€Å"firsthand† smoke is deadly to people’s health leading to lung cancer and heart diseases in adults; asthma and bronchitis in children. Now, the tobacco industry is onto the second-hand smoke. Several anti-smoking organizations are trying to turn smoking in public into a private activity that does not have to involve nonsmokers breath ing second-hand smoke. What is even more important is that many of these organizations convinced a lot of smokers to cut back or quit completely. The problem of second-hand smoke is increasing because it is so common in our society. It makes second-hand smoke the third-ranking cause of lung cancer among nonsmokers. Even in the most elegant restaurants non-smokers are bombarded with exposure to second-hand smoke. â€Å"So-called† smoking sections are almost never useful because the smoke always drifts into the non-smoking eating area. Exposure to second-hand smoke causes several negative reactions on the body of all non-smokers regardless their physical well-being. Second-hand smoke is the smoke exhaled from smokers which comes from the burning end of a cigarette, cigar or pipe. This smoke from the burning end of a cigarette, releases several thousand poisonous chemical compounds (Martin 1). Some of the toxic and cancer causing agents found i...